Transactional
Records Access Clearinghouse
The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC)
is a data gathering, data research and data distribution
organization associated with Syracuse University.
TRAC's Purpose
The purpose of TRAC is to provide the American people --
and institutions of oversight such as Congress, news
organizations, public interest groups, businesses,
scholars and lawyers -- with comprehensive information
about federal staffing, spending, and the enforcement
activities of the federal government. On a day-to-day
basis, what are the agencies and prosecutors actually
doing? Who are their employees and what are they paid?
What do agency actions indicate about the priorities and
practices of government? How do the activities of an
agency or prosecutor in one community compare with those
in a neighboring one or the nation as a whole? How have
these activities changed over time? How does the record of
one administration compare with the next? When the head of
an agency or a district administrator changed, were there
observable differences in actual enforcement priorities?
When a new law was enacted or amended, what impact did it
have on agency activities?
TRAC's History
TRAC was established in 1989 as a research center at
Syracuse University. It has offices there, and in
Washington, D.C. It has been supported by Syracuse
University, foundations such as the Rockefeller Family
Fund, the New York Times Company Foundation, the John S.
and James L. Knight Foundation, the Beldon Fund and the
Open Society Institute, research grants and contracts, and
fees which help offset the costs of providing services to
academics, reporters, attorneys and others subscribing to
TRACFED or FEDPROBE, or those requesting specialized
research and data set preparation.
TRAC's Use of FOIA
TRAC's core purpose is to make information about the
federal government's enforcement and regulatory effort
more accessible to the public. An essential step in this
process is TRAC's systematic and informed use of the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The basic principle of
FOIA is very simple: The records of the federal government
should be generally public. All you need to do is ask. But
because of the sheer number of records, the vast
complexity in how information is recorded and stored, and
the uneasiness many agencies feel about the public
examining their day-to-day performance, the actual process
of obtaining federal records is far from simple. In fact,
the systematic collection of such information usually is a
difficult and time-consuming task. So difficult, in fact,
that many news organizations, public interest groups,
scholars and others do not bother to exercise their rights
under FOIA.
Because comprehensive and relevant records about what
an agency is doing -- and not doing -- are essential to
meaningful oversight, TRAC continuously uses the law to
obtain new data about government enforcement and
regulatory activities. Some agencies are remarkably open.
Other agencies are not. In some circumstances TRAC has to
file suit in federal court to force the release of vital
data. An example of these efforts is TRAC's current suit
against the Justice Department.
TRAC's Analyses of Data
Once TRAC obtains the data through its FOIA efforts, the
information is analyzed. With the use of a variety of
sophisticated statistical techniques, the raw information
obtained from the agencies is checked and verified. Where
possible, data from one agency is compared with another
for general consistency. Through the addition of relevant
population figures and staffing counts, the enforcement
data is placed in an understandable context -- such as the
per capita number of prosecutions. County-level data
obtained by TRAC on significant local community features
can provide useful background about specific federal
enforcement activities. For example, in connection with
FBI robbery investigations in a particular district, the
number of branch banks operating in it would be relevant.
In the same way, information on the relative number of
persons 65 and over living in an area could add
perspective to a report on the prosecution of fraudulent
medical providers who often prey on the elderly.
The focus of these efforts is to develop as
comprehensive and detailed as possible picture about what
federal enforcement and regulatory agencies actually do,
to describe what resources (staffing and funds) they have
to work with to accomplish these tasks, and to organize
all of this information to make it readily accessible to
the public.
TRAC's Services
TRAC offers various information services:
TRAC Public Web
Site.
Since 1996, TRAC has mounted and
updated a series of specialized sites on the World
Wide Web with highly detailed but easy-to-access
information on selected federal enforcement agencies,
special topical reports, and "snapshots"
about federal expenditures, staffing and enforcement.
The sites -- featuring colorful maps and graphs and
tens of thousands of pages of tables and other
supporting material -- are available without charge to
anyone with access to the web. Currently featured are
separate TRAC Web sites describing the enforcement
activities and staffing patterns of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, the Internal
Revenue Service, the Drug
Enforcement Administration, the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the Immigration
and Naturalization Service, and the U.S.
Customs Service.
TRACFED
and FEDPROBE
are TRAC’s two dynamic subscription sites. Each
provides a vast range of information about federal
enforcement activities -- criminal, civil, and
administrative -- as well as detailed information
about federal staffing, federal funds, and the diverse
characteristics of counties, federal districts, and
states. Subscribers with the click of a mouse can
request specific statistics, detailed listings, maps
or charts and have the information return immediately
to their browser. More advanced web-tools allow users
to conduct tailor-made analyses of specific subsets
("data slices") they want to examine in
depth. A flash movie
allows you to view without charge TRACFED and FEDPROBE
features.
All federal criminal enforcement activities are
covered -- under any law or Justice Department program
category, by any agency, and in any one of the 90
federal judicial districts or for the nation as a
whole. The civil enforcement layers allows analysis of
civil litigation handled by the U.S. Attorneys where
the government sues or is itself the subject of a
suit. In either case, broad statistical reviews as
well as detailed information about individual cases or
matters may be obtained. The administrative
enforcement layer, now featuring information about IRS
audit and collection actions, focuses upon
administrative enforcement activities outside of
court.
To place these enforcement activities -- criminal,
civil, and administrative -- into a broader context,
another layer provides detailed information on federal
civilian employees, where they work, what they do, and
how much they are paid. Again, broad statistical
overviews including rankings and time trends are
available, as well as detailed information on salary,
post of duty, and occupation down to the individually
named federal employee. A further layer on federal
funds provides comprehensive information about where
government funds are spent -- by program and agency --
for each state, federal district, and county. Finally,
the community context layer provides demographic and
economic information about every county, state and
federal judicial district.
TRAC Training
More and more, TRAC is training individuals and
organizations who want to improve their ability to use
data to examine the actual policies of individual U.S.
Attorneys, agencies, and administrations or to explore
how well or poorly a specific law is functioning. Our
training does not focus on technical skills like down
loading data into spreadsheets or using
software-specific commands. Rather, it is designed to
give students a solid framework for understanding how
they can use enforcement data for constructive
oversight. What information is available? How should
it be explored? So far, TRAC's training has been aimed
at news organizations that want to improve the quality
of their reporting. Examples of the training have
included one-day hands-on seminars for up to 10
reporters and editors working for news groups like the
Associated Press and more intensive three-day hands-on
seminars for students from a variety of different
organizations. TRAC soon hopes to expand its training
to other members of the oversight community such as
public interest groups.
TRAC Research.
Congressional committees, government agencies, public
interest groups, news organizations, lawyers, scholars
and others frequently hire TRAC to create specialized
data packages or to conduct focused data studies.
Human Rights Watch, for example, needed data on how
the government was enforcing the laws against brutal
law enforcement officials. Morality in Media wanted
information about the federal prosecution of
pornographers. One of the independent counsels sought
information on how long the Justice Department took to
prosecute cases under a selected group of statutes.
New organizations like The New York Times, the Washington
Post, U.S. News and World Report, the Wall
Street Journal, the Rolling Stone, the Philadelphia
Inquirer, the Boston Globe and the St
Louis Post Dispatch all had data needs that TRAC
could satisfy. Selected examples of how the news
media, Congress, and public interest groups have used
TRAC data are available in the TRAC
at Work section on this web site.
The co-directors of TRAC are Susan Long, a statistician
and professor in Syracuse University's School of
Management who as a FOIA pioneer has specialized in
federal enforcement issues for more than 25 years, and David
Burnham, an investigative writer and former New York
Times reporter, who has covered local, state and federal
enforcement issues since 1966. TRAC has offices in Syracuse,
NY and Washington, D.C..
|